Hundreds of gibberish papers still lurk in the scientific literature

The nonsensical computer-generated articles, spotted years after the problem was first seen, could lead to a wave of retractions.
By
  1. Richard Van Noorden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

Access through your institution
Buy or subscribe

Nonsensical research papers generated by a computer program are still popping up in the scientific literature many years after the problem was first seen, a study has revealed1. Some publishers have told Nature they will take down the papers, which could result in more than 200 retractions.

Access options

Access through your institution

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 594, 160-161 (2021)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01436-7

Updates & Corrections

  • Clarification 28 May 2021: This article has been updated to clarify a statement from IOP Publishing.

References

  1. Cabanac, G. & Labbé, C. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24495 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Labbé, C. & Labbé, D. Scientometrics 94, 379–396 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Subjects

Latest on:

Nature Careers

Jobs

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing